We leave when your team can run what we built without us.
Most AI consultancies sell dependency. Retainers that compound. Systems only they can maintain. We do the opposite. Every engagement is scoped around a handoff from day one. Here's how.
Most teams come to us with one of these questions.
2 weeks · Fixed price · For leadership teams
You're being pitched AI from every direction — vendors, internal champions, the board, LinkedIn. You need someone to sort signal from noise against your actual business.
That's what this does.
Interviews and workflow shadowing across the teams you care about. How work actually moves, not how the org chart says it does. Where handoffs stall. Where hidden manual effort lives. What a 10% gain means in your P&L vs. where it doesn't matter.
Every opportunity scored on reach, impact, effort, dependencies, and risk. Build vs. buy vs. hybrid call per project. Sequenced so later projects get cheaper, not more expensive.
Previously scoped: 10-day on-site audit across 6 departments at a global OTA. 40 workflows mapped. 6–8 sequenced AI projects. Roadmap targeting 30% profitability uplift. Read the case study →
4 weeks · Fixed price · For teams with a clear problem
You already know what to build. You don't need another audit. You need someone who's shipped these systems before and will build this one properly the first time.
Not a prototype. A system designed for production from day one: evals so you can tell if the output is good, guardrails for when it isn't, observability for when it breaks, documentation for the person who inherits it.
Previously shipped: a voice agent that freed 30% of sales time at CitySupply. A fully-automated outbound engine driving 4× faster sales cycles at BaseClaims. An onboarding agent that cut onboarding time by 95% at Regulars.
Monthly retainer · For organizations ready to build at pace
One shipped workflow is not a transformation. You need to ship consistently, across multiple teams, without dependency on outside help.
Three tiers, depending on scope.
Best for: teams proving AI in one area before going wider.
Book an intro call →Best for: mid-market teams running full GTM transformation.
Book an intro call →Best for: organizations treating AI as a strategic advantage, not a line item.
Book an intro call →6 weeks · 10 modules · Up to 6 participants · On-site or remote
Every engagement above ends with a handoff to your team. This one is the handoff, sold on its own.
Six weeks that take a cohort from opening a terminal to shipping agentic systems in production, with the judgment to know what's worth building in the first place. It works for two kinds of people: business and product folks who want to build for Growth, Sales and Ops without waiting on an engineering queue, and engineers who want current patterns for agentic systems and how to embed them in the company.
Every module ends with something running: an agent, a workflow, a deployed system. Exercises are built on your industry and your processes, so week-one output is already relevant. By week six the cohort has closed with a real internal workflow in production.
Repetition builds instinct. After six weeks of building, your people can take a new idea, break it into steps, and build it themselves, long after the program ends.
A repeatable method to find the highest-return workflows, prioritise them, and kill the ones that won't pay. AI projects, not AI theatre.
Before the program, AI felt like an alien thing. Now, when I have an idea, I feel like I can sit down, break it into the right steps, and build it.
Olympia · Program graduate
Fixed price · Remote · For Dust workspaces
Dust is moving from tier-based billing to usage-based. Under tier pricing, a wasteful agent and an efficient one cost you the same. Usage-based billing prices the difference.
Most of the waste sits in the plumbing. A sync agent re-copying rows a script already computed. An afternoon briefing that recomputes what the morning one already said. A sub-agent returning 14,000 tokens that its parent re-reads at every later step. Nobody built any of it badly. It grew, and nothing was watching.
One workspace, 35 users, every agent opened and costed.
Identified, sequenced, and costed, with an evidence grade on every number.
More agent work for the same budget, against the pre-audit pace.
Every agent, its real cost, its real usage, its owner, its value rating, reconciled against your billing so the baseline matches what you were actually charged. Includes a trigger-ownership census, which is the only workspace-wide view of your schedules, since Dust triggers are visible solely to whoever created them.
Opened up from their real runs. One page each: what it does, where the money actually goes step by step, and what to change, ranked by effort class — a settings toggle, an instruction paste, or a small rebuild.
Eight plays that generalise past your top ten, each with the trigger that tells your builders when it applies, plus a reusable template for workflow #11 onwards. This is the durable part.
Scripts you run monthly: spend reconciliation, spike attribution, trigger census, per-tool cost and error drift, zero-usage sweep, and two automated watches that surface new optimisation candidates before they become line items.
Bounded queues with an "already tried" marker. Named owners. Return contracts on sub-agents. The paid-twice check: does a platform you already own do this natively. No automation running on personal credentials. And a validation protocol for every model or instruction change.
Vlad dove deep into how we were using Dust—identifying what we were doing wrong, what could be improved, and opportunities we hadn’t considered.
Felix Keser · CEO, Nexio Projects
What that engagement delivered: up to 95% cost reduction on the priority AI workflows, credit spend on a major sync taken to zero from 1,210 per run, and a 40% cut in token usage across agent instructions.
Not "ongoing partnership." Not "trusted long-term advisor." A handoff.
On the Sprint, it's the team that'll run the workflow we just shipped.
On the Accelerator, it's the team we've been training alongside us for months.
On the Diagnostic, it's the internal leader who'll own the roadmap.
On the Program, the handoff is the whole product.
On the Cost Audit, it's the admin who runs the monthly review from then on.
The test we apply: can the team run this without us? If the answer is yes, we step back. If the answer is no, we haven't finished.
This is the single biggest reason to work with us instead of hiring a freelancer or signing a long-term consulting retainer. Both of those are optimized for you to keep paying. We're optimized for you to stop.