Scores across volume, repeatability, error cost, and variability
Answer a few questions about a workflow and get a 0–100 fit score with a clear build, pilot, or skip verdict — before you spend a euro on it.
Many times a day scores high; once a quarter scores low.
Same steps every time scores high; needs judgment each time scores low.
Lots of expensive human time or costly mistakes today scores high.
Highly variable, lots of exceptions scores high (and lowers fit).
Promising, but keep a human in the loop for the long tail.
Score a single, named process — not a department. "Reconcile supplier invoices" scores cleanly; "finance" does not.
Volume (how often it runs), repeatability (how rules-based it is), error cost (what a mistake costs), and variability (how much each case differs). High volume and high repeatability push the score up; high variability pushes it down.
Above 70 is a strong automation candidate worth a pilot. 40–70 means automate part of it or keep a human in the loop. Below 40 means the workflow is too messy or too rare — automating it will cost more than it saves.
Run every candidate workflow through the same scorer to rank them objectively. It's the fastest way to kill the projects that feel exciting but don't pencil out.
A free tool gives you a hypothesis. The 30-minute diagnostic is where we pressure-test it against your actual workflows — and decide whether the project is worth building, buying, or skipping.